The problem often is, that the person doing the QUESTIONING, are themselves
acting with motives that are not pure or are warped. I hear what you are
saying, though.
In this country, if someone accuses you of something, and if that something,
if true, means you broke a law, or in the case of civil cases a situation is
created where the authorities would need to act for someone's protection,
than the judge must hear the case. (I know my wording is clumbsy, but the
point is there).
So plenty of innocent people get caught up in horrendous personal situations
that alter their lives for years, or forever, because of sociopaths with a
mission.
The fact is that some guilty people will always 'get away with it' ansd some
will get caught. No reason to catch the innocent people.
Tom C.
From: "E.R.N. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: More Texas Photo Issues
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:54:50 -0500
P. J. Alling wrote:
Yes, but Jefferson lived in the days of the duel. It was much easier to
get satisfaction, or plead self defense if some evil doer released by the
courts decided to attack you or your property. Today the state is
considered to have failed if it can't perfectly protect all it's good
citizens, in spite of the impossibility of the task.
Bob Shell wrote:
On Tuesday, October 18, 2005, at 12:35 AM, Tom C wrote:
However, I would rather see 100 guilty people go free than see one
innocent person, accused, convicted and sentenced unjustly.
You're in good company. Thomas Jefferson said exactly the same thing.
Bob
Also, some people apparently would rather that 100 guilty people go free
than one innocent person be QUESTIONED -- keep that up and all the guilty
will go free.
