Well..., at least a good optical rangefinder/viewfinder is fairly
expensive to make (would add $100 or so to the price of the camera). A
decent optical viewfinder would not be so expensive, but would be quite
a bit bulkier than the tiny parascopic style viewfinders on most P&S
cameras (digital or not).
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Raimo K wrote:
That would indeed be good - but I do not think that there are more
than one of those - Epson.
Looks like good optical viewfinder is expensive to make.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
----- Original Message ----- From: "Toralf Lund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: LCD screens and the way we photograph...
<snip>
Seriously, though, it seems to me that the "best of two worlds" is
actually a digital camera with a good optical viewfinder. I'm not
sure the optical viewfinder concept is broken, so why try to fix it?
- T
