On 27 Oct 2005 at 6:25, William Robb wrote: > It seems to be pretty good with some of the stratospherically priced glass > that > I use as well. Maybe you need a better tripod.....
I don't disagree, I'm just incensed at being told contusions that I need no higher spec's in a camera and being fobbed off when I say the current Pentax DSLR cameras don't make the best use of the existing glass. Do you seriously believe that there is no room for improvement WRT the quality that a DSLR can return from the Limited lenses for instance? And my tripods are plenty good but I rarely need them these days, in good light is there is rarely evidence of a pixel width of shake induced blur. I'm sure it's due in part to the small mirror and quiet shutters in the DSLRs but that's only half of it, the other story is resolving capability or lack thereof. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
