Isnt that an odd aspect ratio? neither the traditional 4x3 or the newer 16x9. Whats the deal on that? JCO
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 4:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Modern PC hardware, Was: Re: Full Frame I run my 20-inch Apple Cinema Display (trendy flat panel:-) at 1680 x 1050. It's superb for image editing and is beautifully in synch with my printer. Paul On Nov 12, 2005, at 4:02 PM, William Robb wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" > Subject: RE: Modern PC hardware, Was: Re: Full Frame > > >> FWIW, One thing I did just upgrade regarding image editing and PCing >> in general is my monitor. I switched to a 19" super trinitron CRT >> running at 1200x1600 and the difference is huge compared to my old >> monitor. I would never go back to 960x1280 and that's about all you >> can get on the trendy "flat panel" LCD displays at this point. > > I'm not ready to give up on CRT monitors yet either. My brother in law > has a really nice 21" screen, I'm not sure who makes it, that I am a > little envious of. > Right now I have a 19" Samsung Syncmaster which has been quite good, > but my video card wont support a big enough screen at a refresh rate I > can live with. > I can see a Matrox video card in my future. > > William Robb >
