In a message dated 11/20/2005 2:55:14 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can't decide which RAW converter is the best. I have tried the
latest Adobe beta and Pentax.
Adobe has more options like noise and color fringing reduction. The
white balance settings drive me nuts. Only "As Shot" or Manual are
usable. Adobe RAW would be nice since it allows me to convert PEF to
DNG and save disc space.
The Pentax RAW converter displays the best white balance settings. The
white balance settings are identical (I think) to the camera settings.
The bad thing about the Pentax converter is remaining color noise and
ugly artefact's on color borders/edges.

Jack
===============
I am not familiar with the Pentax convertor. But I am familiar with the Canon 
convertor (and the CS convertor). Based on that, I think I know what you are 
saying.

In the Canon convertor I can set the white balance to a different camera 
setting, change from sunlight to shade for instance. In CS I have to use the 
slider. The switching white balance completely with one switch is nice. 
However, in 
the Canon convertor, I can switch the white balance in the RAW file and have 
it saved again as RAW. It doesn't need to actually be CONVERTED to another 
file format when I do that.

Is it possible for you to do the same with the Pentax convertor? Then if you 
want you could switch the white balance setting, leave it RAW and do the 
actual conversion to another file format in CS based on the altered RAW you 
made 
and have all the benefits of the other better settings in CS (or CS2).

I am finding the temperature slider in CS better the more I use it. I really 
only prefer the switch to camera white balance settings in the Canon convertor 
when I have not actually reset the WB on the camera right for a whole series 
of photographs (I now pay more attention to the WB setting on the camera to 
begin with when I am shooting).

But if the above will work for you, you might try that.

Marnie aka Doe 

Reply via email to