On 24 Nov 2005 at 15:15, graywolf wrote: > If the final image is all that is important, and it is going to be used > in digital form (Web, pre-press, etc) digital is the way to go because > you save a bunch of intermediate steps. If you want an exhibition print > film is the way to go because you save a bunch of intermediate steps.
I'm in agreement, I still like using my friends darkroom but I'm very glad that wet printing isn't my only option these days. What I don't understand is how it's possible to avoid a bunch of intermediate steps if using film processes to create an exhibition print? I can only assume that your suggesting that someone else would have to create the print? Then the photographer would have to be hanging over their shoulder directing them or alternately leave the final image look to the discretion of the printer? Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
