No, Im not shure. You may very well be right. Anyone else tried this with
the "D"?

Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 7. december 2005 01:06
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: A better 70-200mm F. 2.8


You sure that your viewfinder and sensor distances are equal?  Could be
that one needs to be adjusted.

Jens Bladt wrote:

>I did that I few days ago. Focusing at 10 inch (centre of the view
finder) -
>the 11 inch mark (further away from me) was sharp. I shot that test from
>appr. 2-3 meters distance witrh the  FA 2.8/80-200mm.
>
>Jens Bladt
>http://www.jensbladt.dk
>
>-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
>Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sendt: 6. december 2005 00:18
>Til: [email protected]
>Emne: Re: A better 70-200mm F. 2.8
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bruce Dayton"
>Subject: Re: A better 70-200mm F. 2.8
>
>
>
>
>>Hello Jens,
>>
>>My personal feeling is that the sensor area is larger than we would
>>like to think.  Achieving AF within the sensor bounderies (not visible
>>to us) is all the system is going to do.
>>
>>
>
>An intersting, though mostly useless exercise is to take a picture of a
>ruler that is at an angle to the camera, and see where the focus is in
>relation to the chosen focus point.
>
>William Robb
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
When you're worried or in doubt,
        Run in circles, (scream and shout).



Reply via email to