On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
Hi Bill, the only reason the 40 is in the running is that I
already have the K35/2, K35/3.5 and A35/2.8.
I'll feel a little guilty buying another 35 with the 2
excellent K's on the shelf. I've heard so many good things
about the FA35/2 though.........
I've never even _seen_ an A35/2!
I do have an M40/2.8 but the rear element is seperating.
I can see a way out of this Don. If you can take the pain of parting
with a K-lens or two, that is.
If I was using the 35 much, and esp. if I had a -D, I would probably
have parted company with my excellent K35/3.5 and replaced it with the
FA35/2. YMMV.
Kostas
