On 14 Dec 2005 at 19:07, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Just love that sneering bullshit, eh? Yes, the packaging (meaning > supporting circuitry, casing, stand, user features, etc) is indeed > better and that generally tends to make Apple monitors more expensive.
No I wasn't talking about circuitry, my guess is that the ROMs are likely the only thing that's different on the technology side. > What makes me angry has nothing to do with your opinion of Apple > goods, I really don't care about that at all. > > What makes me angry is that you would see fit to waste the list' time > with sneering and bad-mouthing known-good products for no good > reason. If you think another product is of comparable quality at a > lower price, just say so, don't do the stupid sneering dance like you > always do. > > Get off it, go do something useful. My problem is that i people seem to see very little else as viable in digital imaging, the bias needs addressing. And here Apple monitors are more expensive than most others. At this point YOU are the only person who has suggested that I'm not willing to help, note that I didn't discount an Apple monitor as suitable. The acrid defensiveness you display is quite amusing though I do hope you get over it. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
