You don't know that ... you're making an assumption, certainly painting a generalization with a very broad brush. In any case, it can't be done. There are too many variables even if the photographer were standing in precisely the same spot, using the same camera, lens, and film - which s/he wouldn't, and couldn't, be using.
And, so what if someone wanted to attempt to create the exact photo. It would be a learning experience for them. You're making way to big a deal out of some insignificant event. Shel > Pål Jensen wrote: > > My point is that this goes far beyond that. These people try to recreate the > > exact image. To the extent of standing in the same tripod holes, exactly the > > same light; exactly the same time of day - they even try to get the moon in > > exactly the same place in the sky!
