Nothing wrong with your ME it's just that LX's are magic :)
At 09:05 AM 7/25/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>tom wrote:
>
> > Aaron likes his M 28/2.8. Mine was the worst lens I've ever owned behind
> > that Tak. I guess one of us could be a bonehead...
>
>I didn't like it for the longest time. I still find it a very poor
>performer wide open...but I think that my old ME Super had a focus
>accuracy problem. Once I picked up my LX and put that 28 on it, the
>sharpness of the images that lens produced seemed to increase. Poking
>around on the net, I read that focus accuracy problems (like the ground
>glass being slightly out of position) would display themselves most
>obviously with the use of wide angle lenses, leading me to blame my
>beloved ol' ME Super.
>
>The impression is, of course, subjective, and a myriad of other factors
>could be involved. I'd put together a somewhat controlled test to check
>this out, but that ME Super has sadly been retired to the old camera
>shelf, seeing as how its advance system has been totally shot from
>extensive use. I was gonna repair it, but then I got an LX and a great
>deal on another ME Super in better shape than mine ever was...
>
>-Aaron
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
