Couldn't be placed in the frame any better. Ideal "soft" lighting. ;-)) What equipment used?
Jack --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am not getting out and taking pictures these days -- difficult to. > So I've > been going through some old photos. > > This was taken back in May '05 when I shot a bunch of old gas pumps. > At that > time I was told the one I showed on list was too soft. Upset me > because that's > what my former photography teacher kept telling me. I changed lenses > (one > shot too soft), then cameras systems, and improved my technique, so I > thought I > was way past the too soft stuff. Anyway, that's why I got upset. Raw > nerve. > > This is the first photo I've shown with PS post processing. I am > learning PS > CS. Before it was all Elements post processing. All I did though was > use auto > stuff and USM. > > I plan to shoot them again. But I also have bunches of gas pump > photos that I > may work up into a collage too. They are really more striking when > taken > together. > > I think this one's mildly interesting, but nothing great. I've > considered a > closer crop on some of the flakiness and/or gear stuff. Suggestions > on that > welcome. > > Its interest is more in its age. This was the oldest gas pump they > had. Dated > back to the 1920's -- 1928 I think. Maybe a tad earlier. > > http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/oldgas.htm > > Comments are okay. Just don't tell me it's too soft. > > Marnie aka Doe ;-) > > __________________________________ Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year. http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
