The very reason I added that email was to explain that the owner should simply be made aware of the possibilities. If the owner chose to immediately terminate the employee, that would to wholly his decision and he'd have to own it. In the owner's place, I'd want to current to monitor events.
Jack --- Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 08 January 2006 17:10 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded > > > > Making the store owner aware of your information is not a > > profession of a known fact. That having been made clear, the > > action taken by the owner is not your responsibility. > > > > Jack > > Yes it is. The reason for telling the owner appears to be that you > don't > think the guy should be working there, even though he hasn't been > convicted. > So if you tell the employer, and the guy loses his job, it is clearly > a > result of your actions, so it is your responsibility. If he's later > found > not guilty, will you give him another job and compensate him for the > lost > earnings and defamation of character? > > If you think it's ok for people to lose their job based on hearsay, > how will > you feel when somebody decides they don't like you, and start telling > your > employer that you're a paedophile? > > -- > Cheers, > Bob > > __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com
