I think this falls clearly into the category "if one doesn't know what they
are talking about, one should keep one's mouth shut".
Spreading gossip, innuendo, and hearsay does not help the cause of truth or
justice.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:25:32 -0800 (PST)
Why do you conclude that the shop owner will fire the employee prior to
the court's decision? Would you? I wouldn't, nor would I bear any
responsibility if he did. Advising the owner is the "responsible" thing
to do.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The shop owner isn't in jeopardy. All he did was hire someone,
> apparently after any alleged misdeeds took place. Until proven
> guilty,
> the accused should be allowed to earn a living. The world is plagued
> with busybodies who can't keep their nose out of other people's
> business.
> Paul
> On Jan 8, 2006, at 4:17 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> > In this case, Paul, the shop owner is in jeopardy and deserves to
> be
> > alerted.
> >
> > Jack
> >
> > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I've found that unless someone has been placed in jeopardy, it's
> best
> >>
> >> to mind one's own business. As others have said, "innocent until
> >> proven
> >> guilt."
> >> Paul
> >> On Jan 8, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> >>
> >>> Kevin,
> >>> Understand your dilemma, but even though you don't know yet "who
> is
> >>> working for him", due to this photo related situation, I'd let
> the
> >>> owner know before too many others make the connection.
> >>> Are you certain this is the same person and that the owner won't
> >> fain
> >>> shock and surprise?
> >>>
> >>> Jack
> >>>
> >>> --- Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I recently walked into a large Sydney camera store and ventured
> to
> >>>> the
> >>>> "pro section" to purchase some Fuji Provia. I was astounded that
> >> the
> >>>> person serving me was an ex-photog who is currently in the midst
> >> of
> >>>> a child porn investigation. He worked with his uncle who has
> been
> >>>> charged
> >>>> and a trial is due.
> >>>>
> >>>> My question is, should I make the store owner aware of who is
> >> working
> >>>> for him?
> >>>> Am I being vigilant or is it sheer bloody mindedness on my part?
> >>>> Is this really none of my business?
> >>>> I must admit this sort of thing boils my blood quickly.
> >>>>
> >>>> Kind regards
> >>>> Kevin
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for
> >> lunch.
> >>>>
> >>>> Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> __________________________________________
> >>> Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
> >>> Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> >>> dsl.yahoo.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________
> > Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
> > Just $16.99/mo. or less.
> > dsl.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
__________________________________________
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
