Do you know for a ~fact~ that this man took pornographic pics and supplied them to child porn web sites? If he did, and it is a fact, why was he not charged along with his uncle. Until he's charged and brought to trial, let the police handle things. If he did do something wrong, maybe the police and Attorney General have a reason for not charging him. IOW, there may be more to this than you know about.
Do you recall that, a few months ago, there were two discussions dealing with this subject. In one case a man at a sports event had his camera confiscated and he was hauled in by the police. After reviewing the pics the Attorney General threw the whole thing out and chastised the cops for their overzealousness. Around that time I was stopped by the local police in a neighboring town because someone suspected me of being suspicious and because I was carrying a camera walking past a school yard and playground. One could easily assume that I was a bad boy had they only seen the scene between me and the cop, and not heard the conversation that took place between us. Before you open your mouth, you'd best be ~VERY~ sure about the circumstances from all points of view, not just yours. And even then it may be best to keep your mouth shut. That you commented (threatened?) that you'd tell everyone you could about this fellow and the situation, including people in other countries! suggests to me that you're behaving a bit irrationally. Just let things work themselves out. As someone said, the police know who and where he is, and it's possible that his employer knows as well, and if he does, he may have more information than you. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Kevin Waterson > Not really so confused. Some of the images these people were taking were of > my own children in various dance costumes along with hundreds of other children > at various childrens dance events. These images were supplied to child porn sites > on the net along with other more.. sick images.
