I don't know about that, I expect that real justice is a likely either
way. Juries can be capricious, so can judges. The system doesn't even
try to guarantee justice by the way, only process.
Tom C wrote:
Don't think my earlier comments meant I have faith in the justice
system(s). It's just that one probably stands a better chance of
justice (statistically) if their case is heard by a jury than by a
judge, or any other single person.
Tom C.
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Vigilant or Bloody Minded
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:46:58 -0000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >and when you castrate an innocent person, how will you put his balls
> >back on?
>
> Someone proven by the courts to be guilty is likely to be
> guilty.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/uk/2001/life_of_crime/misca
rriages.stm
> I'm happy with the risk he might be innocent. Balls away!
...until it's you, or your son, presumably.
Bob
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
- Re: Vigilant or Bloody Minded P. J. Alling
-
