> chip is actually composed of several CCD chips stitched together in some > special (presumably patented ;-) way. This means they can build > large chips > from small wafers. > > The yield in this case would seem to be better. But then I'm not a > statistician. > > doctor digi The smaller a specific chip is, the smaller the chance would be, to have a fault in it. If you have a process with one error in every square inch, and you have a chip of that size, you would have one error per chip and a yield of 0%. The same process on a chip of a quarter of that size, will have three correct chips and one fault, leading to a yield of 75%, quite a difference. Frits - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera Norman Baugher
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera David A. Mann
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera ZawadiMedia
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera William Robb
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera David A. Mann
- Digital questions: was: Re: Is the New LX G... William Robb
- Re: Digital questions: was: Re: Is the ... Doug Franklin
- Re: Digital questions: was: Re: Is the ... David A. Mann
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera Doctor Digi
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Cam... Frits J. W�thrich
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital... Doctor Digi
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera David A. Mann
- RE: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera John Francis
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera Aaron Reynolds

