[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Thanks for your point Dave, but I stressed "well exposed" negative/slide, the
> inference being not just "sharp" but "well exposed" meaning tones and
> shadows-etc.

Your original post was using a disposable camera as an example, saying
that there was 60MB of data on the film in a $5 disposable camera.  I
believe that this is where the confusion is stemming from.

-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to