[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for your point Dave, but I stressed "well exposed" negative/slide, the > inference being not just "sharp" but "well exposed" meaning tones and > shadows-etc. Your original post was using a disposable camera as an example, saying that there was 60MB of data on the film in a $5 disposable camera. I believe that this is where the confusion is stemming from. -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera David A. Mann
- Digital questions: was: Re: Is the New LX G... William Robb
- Re: Digital questions: was: Re: Is the ... Doug Franklin
- Re: Digital questions: was: Re: Is the ... David A. Mann
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera Doctor Digi
- RE: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Cam... Frits J. W�thrich
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital... Doctor Digi
- Re: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera David A. Mann
- RE: Is the New LX Going to Be a Digital Camera John Francis
- Aaron Reynolds

