I have mixed feelings. I find the control layout of the D to be much
more to my liking. There have been times when I ran out of buffer with
the D. I haven't really been able to do that with the Ds, so far at least.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't have a D but I compared the D and DS briefly for a bit when I
was in the UK last June, my friend Richard has the D. To my casual
test, there was very little difference in focusing performance with
the same lens.
Curiously, Richard finds the D a much more satisfying camera, to the
point where he bought and sold a DS. Where I prefer the controls and
operation of the DS, but would be pretty happy with either.
Godfrey
On Jan 14, 2006, at 8:23 PM, Glen wrote:
Sorry to run this thread slightly off-topic, but how does the
accuracy and efficiency of the DS compare to the D?
Am I missing out on a lot, by not having the D?
To me, the DS doesn't seem too bad. I tried it in continuous mode
the other day, and I thought it did better than I would have in MF.
Then again, I'm slow and meticulous by nature. :)
thanks,
Glen
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
