No, I mean that "facts" often found in Wikipedia have been changed and altered by reader input, at least that's my understanding. IOW, it can't be trusted to be a neutral and honest reference.
When I see the tape of Cruise's interview with Matt Lauer, I can draw my own conclusions. Right now, while I don't doubt what some people say happened, I tend to. When passions are high and feelings are strong, it's often the case that those reporting events are, if not mistaken about the facts, quite possibly putting their own spin on them, engaging in hyperbole, misspeaking, and in other ways not giving a totally neutral and disinterested account. I would agree that, if everything that has been said here is true and factual, TC may be an overly impassioned zealot wrt Scientology. To call him weird is, IMO, subjective, especially wrt to his appearance on the Oprah show and some of his other personal actions. But then, I'm a bit eccentric and out of the mainstream myself, so seeing a man jump up and down on a couch on national TV doesn't strike me as being at all odd. Having the same person sit there and calmly and intellectually explain his feelings of love, or any of another of his passions, would strike me as somewhat odd behavior. Shel > [Original Message] > From: E.R.N. Reed > >Wikipedia is bullshit .... > > > you mean it didn't happen?
