> > From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It's that second dog behind the first one. It obscures the child's > face. Had it not been there, and one could see just the child's > profile and the "main" dog, I think it would have been okay. Or, had > I been able to move a bit, so that one could see the child's face > perhaps from a front 3/4 view (so that we could see a bit more of his > face), I think this one might have had a chance of working.
Can't you Phix it in Photoshop(TM)? I'll get my coat. ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
