In a message dated 1/25/2006 4:46:55 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's that second dog behind the first one. It obscures the child's face. Had it not been there, and one could see just the child's profile and the "main" dog, I think it would have been okay. Or, had I been able to move a bit, so that one could see the child's face perhaps from a front 3/4 view (so that we could see a bit more of his face), I think this one might have had a chance of working.
But, as is, the child/dog interaction is just to muddled and hard to see. Am I close to what you may think, Shel (or anyone else, for that matter...)? cheers, frank ========== Yes. That was my reaction. Wasn't going to comment, but you've nailed what bothered me. Marnie aka Doe
