If the bike were the only issue, I'd agree that it would benefit the scene were it not in visual contact with one of the dogs.
Jack --- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/25/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think I agree with your analysis, for the most part. (I do like > the > > bicycle in the background, though.) > > > > Perhaps you should change the title to "One Dog Too Many"? ;-) > > > > I agree with what you say about the bike, Mark, and disagree with > those who say it should be taken out. It puts the photo in a place, > and I think balances that part of the frame nicely. Were I given to > crop (which I'm usually not, especially for a pic that's not worth > that much anyway - too much mental effort <g>), I might take out some > of the empty sidewalk on the left. I think that would make for a > nicer balance... > > I like your title, BTW. <g> > > cheers, > frank > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
