In a message dated 7/29/01 8:44:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << So we have one subjective meaning, one arbitrary meaning, and the closest we get to an objective standard is a closely related (not the same) concept with _fuzzy_boundaries_. >> There is nothing "fuzzy" about the build of the "pro" cameras Canon and Nikon produce. There is ~no one~ who reads this list who thinks different, at least not when confining the topic to the 35mm SLR genre of "pro" cameras. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Professional: meta-discussion D. Glenn Arthur Jr.
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion Frank Theriault
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion Shel Belinkoff
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion Frank Theriault
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion Mark Roberts
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion P�l Jensen
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion ZawadiMedia
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion William Robb
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion D. Glenn Arthur Jr.
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion ZawadiMedia
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion ZawadiMedia
- Professional: meta-discussion Mike Johnston
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion tom
- Re: The origins of HAR!! Alin Flaider
- Re: Professional: meta-discussion ZawadiMedia

