Re: Professional: meta-discussion

[D. Glenn Arthur Jr.]

Mafud responded:
> In a message dated 7/29/01 8:44:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> writes:
> << 
>  So we have one subjective meaning, one arbitrary meaning, and
>  the closest we get to an objective standard is a closely 
>  related (not the same) concept with _fuzzy_boundaries_. >>
> 
> There is nothing "fuzzy" about the build of the "pro" cameras Canon and Nikon 
> produce. There is ~no one~ who reads this list who thinks different, at least 
> not when confining the topic to the 35mm SLR genre of "pro" cameras. 

What I was calling "fuzzy" was not the build of a "pro" camera.
What's _fuzzy_ are the boundaries of "who counts as a pro" or
"what kinds of pro do we mean" when we discuss "cameras used 
by profesionals".

I have no idea how your response relates to what I wrote.

                                        -- Glenn

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .