Huh???
On Feb 9, 2006, at 12:00 AM, Mishka wrote:
it has nothing to do with wundercameraness.
it's more like having cameras that can only load and shoot CVS film.
the cheapest pentax film body is capable of taking pictures as good as
canon 1v.
whatever digital pentax has now is not.
paul:
caon g1 is as good now as it has ever been. but it still sucks, and
given the available
alternatives is pretty much irrelevant. unlike mx and lx.
best,
mishka
On 2/8/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pentax has always been a conservative company, even when they were a
leader. I'd not expect a Canon-wunderkindakamera, but some definite
improvements to what's now offered. For many people that will be
plenty.
But that's the way it always is. So many people bemoaned the istDS
variations, but the camera seems to be a good seller. It seems that
some
people are hoping that Pentax will go head-to-head with Canon and
Nikon.
That, imo, would be a bad move. Pentax should define and know its
market,
and make it's cameras very appealing to that market.
The possibility of new and more "Pentax-like" lenses is of great
interest.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
they are really taking their time. by photokina it is going to be as
relevant as...
On 2/8/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pål Jensen wrote:
http://www.bjp-online.com/public/showPage.html?page=315495
This is really good news, as long as the new DSLR can compete with
teh
D200 and whatever Canon introduces this month
-Adam
