Now *that's* an army I would sign on for :) Sadly no, by definition, that's not it. And you know your analogy was worse than mine.
j On 2/15/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Secular Humanism? > On Feb 15, 2006, at 12:41 AM, Juan Buhler wrote: > > > Neoconservatism? > > > > On 2/14/06, Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> and which is that? > >> > >> best, > >> mishka > >> > >> On 2/14/06, E.R.N. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Demonstrably untrue. > >>> I'm not saying it wasn't true several centuries ago, but there's > >>> currently one religion making a greater attempt to impose its > >>> beliefs on > >>> the rest of the world -- by force and fear of violence -- and that > >>> religion isn't (nor does it claim to be) any branch of Christianity. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Juan Buhler > > Water Molotov: http://photoblog.jbuhler.com > > Slippery Slope: http://color.jbuhler.com > > > > -- Juan Buhler Water Molotov: http://photoblog.jbuhler.com Slippery Slope: http://color.jbuhler.com
