Nope - Hitler was never a socialist, neither was Stalin. Both of them fought
the socialists the best they could.
Regards

Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Collin R Brendemuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 17. februar 2006 16:28
Til: [email protected]
Emne: RE: Religion, Christ vs. the Other Guy


Jens Bladt
Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:00:55 -0800
 >
 >Hitler was a fascist, promoting himself by the means of - partly -
 >socialistic/communistic ideas. Hitler tried to eradicate the Jews.
 >Stalin was a fascist promoting himself by the means of
 >socialistic/communistic ideas. Stalin tried to eradicate the
 >socialists/communists and any other group of people who was a threat to
his
 >power.
 >What they had in common was fascism - and of course the time.
 >
 >Jens Bladt
 >http://www.jensbladt.dk

Fascism was Mussolini's form of government.  Hitler was a National
Socialist.  They're different.
It's a rewrite of history to make them the same.

Stalin was a Communist, though a bit different than his predecessor
Lenin.  Stalin was clearly far
more a totalitarian and starved to death 20 million  of his own
people.  Mao was also a Communist,
again different somewhat than Stalin and Lenin.  He, his wife, and
the other two members of the
"Gang of Four" were responsible for the deaths of an estimated 10 to
30 million in the
"Cultural Revolution" of the 1960s.

Communism and socialism both take many forms.  The socialism of
France and Germany is clearly
different than the old USSR's Communist socialism, even though they
may share a common
philosophical heritage.

Collin


"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
                                                 -- Jim Elliott

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/263 - Release Date: 02/16/2006

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.10/263 - Release Date: 02/16/2006

Reply via email to