> > From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/02/20 Mon AM 12:33:03 GMT > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Enabled: world's smallest 35mm SLR > > I checked the dimensions and it seems that the MX and some other M-series > bodies are smaller than the *ist. The biggest issue is the depth of the > camera bodies as far as being able to slip them into a pocket. I've been > able to slide the MX into a large shirt pocket. Can't do that with the > *ist because it's thicker. The *ist is quite a bit lighter, however. > > Shel
I think the *ist wins if you put the words "autofocus, mass production" in the description. > > > > > Unca Mikey said > > > > > > > >>I thought I would come out of lurk mode long enough > >>to show off my new toy, what I believe to be the world's > >>smallest full-frame 35mm SLR. > >>http://www.flickr.com/photos/uncamikey/101750740/ > > > > [Original Message] > > From: keith_w > > > I didn't' know it was so SMALL! > > > > Hmmmm. keith > > > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
