Rod,
How would you compare the resolution of the Pentax 67 and istD? With
Velvia 100F, for example? 
I expect some such answer as; "there is no comparison". I recently sold
a Mamiya 6 outfit largely due to problematic focusing (especially with
the 150mm lens) and rangefinder inconveniences. When I did my job, the
images were magnificent.
I've often thought of owning a Pentax 67, and would like to read your
personal thoughts on its performance and handling.

Thanks,

Jack

--- Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 1 Mar 2006 at 21:01, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> 
> > Isn't that what they're doing now with these oddball pancake lenses
> and 
> > such?  Trying to sell on design concept rather than numbers?
> 
> I think it's more that they are selling small and cute at the moment
> to my mind 
> and listening to user comments on various forums, Cosina are selling
> new age 
> retro:
> 
> http://www.cameraquest.com/Voigt%20SL.htm
> 
> >>
> > But still -- I'm working on 600mb files of scenic Italy right now, 
> > generated by a Pentax 67 and Velvia 100F.  Whenever I hear any
> chatter 
> > about digital stuff and bigger files and more resolution, I just
> think 
> > of what I can already produce here and shrug.  Shooting digital is 
> > cheaper in terms of material consumption and quicker in terms of 
> > turnaround, and sometimes I need that.  I certainly need it for 
> > baseball.
> 
> I'm still running 67 (Mamiya 7II) and an LS-8000 so I know where you
> are coming 
> from but having to deal with film give me the heebie jeebies, it
> costs a 
> fortune for me to buy film and good processing and I so hate
> scanning.
>  
> > But getting even close to 67 is still so very far away at a level
> that 
> > allows shooting from the hip in the way that you can with a 67.
> 
> I've recently been shooting pano sequences using my *istD both on and
> off 
> tripod and even off tripod a pretty sloppy quickly shot sequence of
> images can 
> be flawlessly strung together to produce quite a large file size.
> Granted it's 
> not a one frame capture but it's serving me for 2/3 of the types of
> images that 
> were 67 only territory for me in days gone by.
> 
> > It'll be a big test for me this weekend, as I'm going to go on a
> little 
> > roadtrip and NOT bring my 67, just the DS2.  We'll see if I regret
> it.  
> > I do need to be more comfortable with it before April.
> 
> Don't forget to shoot some sequences if you need a wider AOV or
> higher res. If 
> shooting hand held just try to approximately pivot around the lens,
> fix the 
> exposure and provide 30-50% overlap between frames. :-)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Rob Studdert
> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
> Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to