You then must move the thumbnails along to find the last pic you looked
at. I get it. To avoid this, having all thumbnails appear on the home
page would simplify the navigation some.
It bothers me a bit that, on my monitor, 'one' of my thumbnails doesn't
show on my gallery directory page, although I probably does on many
others.

Jack

--- mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jack Davis wrote:
> 
> > Mike, I'm butting in here just to say that all I did to see the
> next
> > pic was "click" the little arrow point.
> > 
> > Jack
> 
> Sorry, not being clear.  If I've looked at one picture and know I
> don't 
> want to look at the next but want to move further along the gallery,
> I 
> have to go back to the start.  Just a little niggle.
> 
> > 
> > --- mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>Francis wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Thanks to all who commented!
> >>>I find it very interesting which ones people liked most,
> especially
> >>
> >>>because they barely overlap at all.
> >>>
> >>>I agree that the BBC contest would be a long shot, but I just
> >>
> >>wanted to 
> >>
> >>>see what you thought. If only my birthday was in August instead of
> 
> >>>February then I would be able to enter in the youth category,
> which
> >>
> >>>would make things a little more optimistic.
> >>
> >>I have great suspicions about that.  When I see 12 yearolds
> producing
> >>
> >>perfect pictures with about £5000 worth of camera equipment, I have
> >>to 
> >>wonder how much parental involvement there is.
> >>
> >>
> >>>Bob W.
> >>>You're right  about it being hard to get original bird shots. 
> >>>Fortunately the BBC contest has two categories just for them so
> >>
> >>they are 
> >>
> >>>not competing with more overworked subjects.
> >>
> >>I think yours score on the "environment with a bird in" level
> rather 
> >>than pure bird portraits.
> >>
> >>
> >>>I'm sorry you didn't like the layout. I took great pains to make
> it
> >>
> >>like 
> >>
> >>>that because I thought it made a nicer and less cluttered
> >>
> >>presentation, 
> >>
> >>>giving more focus to the individual photos, and was at least an
> >>
> >>attempt 
> >>
> >>>at originality. I would be interested to hear other people's
> >>
> >>opinions on 
> >>
> >>>this, if they have any.
> >>
> >>I don't mind it so much - it is more irritating that, after looking
> >>at 
> >>one picture, you go back to the beginning of the gallery each time.
> >>
> >>
> >>>Bob Shell,
> >>>I don't know what to say about that. I'm looking at in Firefox
> from
> >>
> >>my 
> >>
> >>>PC and it seems to be working fine although  when I was poking
> >>
> >>around 
> >>
> >>>with it  I did notice some odd things in the script that PS had
> >>
> >>generated.
> >>
> >>>My apologies for not replying to you all individually but it takes
> >>
> >>me so 
> >>
> >>>long to to get out one e-mail that the prospect of trying to send
> >>
> >>five 
> >>
> >>>on the same day is rather daunting,
> >>>
> >>>Thanks again,
> >>>Francis
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>http://photosynth.ca/photo/f/birds/index.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to