G'day Rick, Great shot, but the fisheye effect isn't that obvious. So in that series of yours it isn't tiresome.
Dave On 3/19/06, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since when does the fisheye effect need to be obvious > or tiresome? Putting modesty aside, I could display > for your consideration: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3760021 > > Rick > > --- David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 3/17/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > It's a fun lens, but you will probably want to > > become familiar with ways to > > > de-fisheye the images. > > > > > > William Robb > > > > > > > That's the plan. In general the fisheye effect gets > > tired quickly. > > > > By any chance would have a high res. jpg with the > > exif info or DNG > > file that you wouldn't mind emailing me to practice > > with? > > > > Cheers, > > > > David > > > > > > > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > >
