That's the point. The fisheye makes some shots "work" that otherwise wouldn't, but one has to be careful.
Rick --- David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > G'day Rick, > > Great shot, but the fisheye effect isn't that > obvious. So in that > series of yours it isn't tiresome. > > Dave > > > On 3/19/06, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since when does the fisheye effect need to be > obvious > > or tiresome? Putting modesty aside, I could > display > > for your consideration: > > > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3760021 > > > > Rick > > > > --- David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 3/17/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > It's a fun lens, but you will probably want to > > > become familiar with ways to > > > > de-fisheye the images. > > > > > > > > William Robb > > > > > > > > > > That's the plan. In general the fisheye effect > gets > > > tired quickly. > > > > > > By any chance would have a high res. jpg with > the > > > exif info or DNG > > > file that you wouldn't mind emailing me to > practice > > > with? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
