Hi Paul
thanks for the recommendation, I will try with both lenses/combos.

Prices are such low here on local auctions for my used lenses that I will
keep them.
I would never get enough from sells for a "real" lens ;-)
greetings
Markus



>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 12:13 AM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: Which tele lens for poor mans bird photography
>>
>>
>>I would try both the Tamron mirror lens and the M 200/4 coupled with
>>the A2X converter. Or sell them all and buy an A 400/5.6. The latter is
>>a very good lens that is frequently available for only $300 or slightly
>>more. It will focus close enough to allow full frame bird shots. I
>>don't think any of your other options will do that, and they won't
>>provide as good a result.
>>Paul
>>On Mar 19, 2006, at 6:06 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pentaxians
>>>
>>> I do not have a "real" tele lens for bird photography but would like
>>> to try
>>> to get some cormorant shots soon and therefore seek for your advice:
>>>
>>> I understand that around 400-600mm on film would be a good start for
>>> such
>>> big birds, do you agree?
>>> Anyway, all I have at the moment is listed below, the flashes I own
>>> will not
>>> be powerful enough for more than 12-20 meters fill flash. I'm prepared
>>> to
>>> invest in a better lens when I like that kind of photography but for a
>>> start:
>>>
>>>
>>> Which lens or combination would be the best for that task, I know that
>>> all
>>> of the combinations will be rather slow?
>>>
>>>
>>> a very old Soligor 350mm F 5.6 M42 tele
>>> Tamron SP 70-210 3.5-4 + Tamron SP 1.4
>>> or Tamron SP 2x converter
>>> Pentax M 200mm + Pentax A 2xS converter
>>> Pentax A70-210mm + Pentax A2xS converter
>>>
>>> or still the Tamron SP 500/8 mirror lens despite it's shortcomings?
>>>
>>> Or just forget about bird photography with that poor equipment?
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks for any recommendations
>>>
>>> greetings
>>> Markus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to