And all I'm saying is let's see what kind of time and trouble I have, and what trauma I've suffered. I'm sure the car will be covered, and if there are any other problems, I'll be sure to let the insurance company know.
Unlike others, I'm not the kind of person who thinks first or foremost about suing. > Cotty wrote: The 'damages' are offered as compensation for time and trouble, not to mention the traumatic episode of the actual collision. It's part of why we are supposed to be insured when driving. Through no fault of my wife's, she was heavily inconvenienced and mildly injured. Why should she just 'shoulder the cost' ? And neither should you.
