In art or photography, it's generally a continuous scene that is considerably
longer in one dimension than the other. It is this difference in dimension that
underscores the impression of continuity. To my mind, this is in synch with
dictionary definitions and is typical of nearly all of the panoramas seen here.
In what way do you feel that the panoramas we've seen fail to meet the
convention?
Paul
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What defines a panorama or a panoramic photograph? This discussion
> prompted my visit to a few dictionaries, and, based on the definitions
> found, many, if not most, of the photos presented here as panoramas aren't,
> at least that's the way I understand it. Comments?
>
> Shel
>
>
