Very nice Rob. But isn't this just as expensive as getting a Kaidan Kiwi head? Regards
Jens Bladt http://www.jensbladt.dk -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 27. marts 2006 05:44 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: Using a two axis rail as a substitute for custom pano heads - crazy or viable with modest lens lengths? I understand the two-axis rail as a means for locating the camera at the nodal point. Is the purpose of the L bracket to allow for vertical placement of the camera? I can see how that would be nice in terms of being able to achieve a larger vertical dimension. Paul On Mar 26, 2006, at 8:14 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: > On 26 Mar 2006 at 19:19, Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> Thanks to you and Rob for this. Good information. Which is always much >> better than digital/film or full frame/APS-C debates :-) > > My pano set-up, "L" bracket care of Dave S. > > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP8091.jpg > > Parallax error is a thing of the past :-) > > Cheers, > > > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.1/292 - Release Date: 03/24/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.1/292 - Release Date: 03/24/2006
