Did I happen to mention that I hate the fact that even though I know better,
and would guess I'm fairly intelligent, that my misapplication of homophones
(words that sound the same but are spelled differently and usually mean
different things) is getting worse and worse.
Tom C.
Well THAT'S STUPID! One would think the software would be smart enough to
see that the header line had changed and start a new thread. Do you mean
I've been screwing up the archives all these years and know one here has
SCREAMED THEIR HEAD OFF at me?
Tom C.
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: List Question
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:16:47 -0400
Properly formated threads don't depend on the subject line. Properly
formed threads use the "in reply to" field, in the message header IIRC.
Tom C wrote:
I, as many others are having problems receiving all the messages fron the
list, often not my own. I'm not blaming this on any of the PDML list
inner workings. Is is in general aggravating.
I am curious though... Sometimes I'll reply to an existing PDML e-mail in
order to have the
[email protected] appear automatically in the To: field. I then
erase the body of the message and substitute my own subject line.
However, when I look in the archives, I see my sent message embedded in
the earlier thread ***even though the subject line has changed***.
Tom C.
--
When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout).
