> > From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/05/06 Sat AM 05:44:06 GMT > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: Re: Analog versus Digital Shootout > > Hi! > > > It's still a shocking scan as is the post processing of the direct digital > > capture, it's difficult to derive any useful information from the test. > > > > Two other tests for your amusement: > > > > Nikon D2X versus Mamiya 7 > > http://www.diax.nl/pages/start_mamiya_nikon_uk.html > > > > Canon 1Ds mark II (16mp) and Betterlight scanning back > > http://www.betterlight.com/rest_of_the_picture.asp > > Fascinating articles... What also occurs to me is this. Consider Mamiya > 7 article. The guy there definitely *knows well* how to work with Mamiya > 7. The adoption of digital camera does not happen overnight, it takes > time, lots of time. Usually, which seems to be a part of human nature > (especially male) there is a tendency to neglect "the other toy"... So, > I should say, in order to make a better (I dare not say "proper"), there > has to be at least two testers - one who is proficient with film camera > and another who is good with digital. >
But Boris, the adverts imply that any eedjit (extreme form of idiot) can be as good a photographer as David Bailey as long as they use digital. You're not implying that they are spreading untruth, are you? ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
