I didn't see Cotty's post, but I gotta say, coming from a guy who shoots JPEG the remark is a bit disingenuous <vbg>. Anyway, the results from the Pentax "entry level" DSLR are the same as the results from the istD, and, one can argue, that the smaller RAW file sizes means that more pics can be put on a given size card, saving space and making shooting more efficient. There are a few folks here shooting weddings with a D, and, having seen the work from at least one list member, the results are quite good.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Paul Stenquist > I think it's you Cotty:-)). Seriously, he didn't nit pick. He offered > some suggestions that he'd like to see. Wedding photography isnt > exactly the top of the heap. An entry level DSLR is pretty much all > that's required. > Paul > On May 14, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Cotty wrote: > > > Forgive me for being a bit harsh Brian, but you professionally > > photograph weddings using entry level DSLRs and nit pick ? > > > > I dunno, maybe it's me.
