Yes, but using an expensive camera justifies your charging triple
prices. In Joe Publics mind "Big Black Camera" still equals professional
photographer. However contrary to what most folks think most
professional photographers are mediocre photographers anyway. It is the
ability to sell one's work, not the quality of one's work, that make one
a successful professional photographer.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 15/5/06, Aaron Reynolds, discombobulated, unleashed:
It all depends on how you're using it, Cotty, and what the client wants
in the end. If they're making 8x10s and smaller (and who does bigger
than 8x10s from the non-group shots?), what's wrong with 6MP digital?
If you know what you're doing, it looks great pretty much regardless of
what camera you're using.
Yeah, point taken. I suppose more discerning clients would balk. I would.
Most wedding clients make their decisions by looking at the
photographer's *work*, not his gear. Any customer who based their
decision on what camera was going to be used wouldn't fit my
definition of "discerning".
