Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I just did a very Q&D test of extending the protective area of the 16-45 > hood, and there appears to be plenty of room for a hood that's either > deeper or narrower, or both. So, IMO, a better hood may be available - the > standard hood can certainly be improved upon. Film (digital) at 11:00 <LOL>
You could try the paper hood at http://www.lenshoods.co.uk/hoods/Pentax-SMC-16-45mm-f-4-DA-ED-AL.php as a starting point for experimentation - the template alone gives an extra 5mm or so over the plastic one. S -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
