In a message dated 6/22/2006 8:42:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have been hoping/wishing to raise the standard of photographs submitted and displayed on the PUG, not just get participants. To enter something in the PUG, just to participate, if it's not something one has looked at with a critical eye, brings the overall quality down.
Tom C. ========= Basically, I agree. So if my Optio Si4 architecture shot is lousy, I won't share it. OTOH, some "newbies" have shared on the PUG when they haven't shared PESOs. I've noticed this over the last couple of years. Personally, I would want that to continue and I wouldn't want anyone to feel intimidated that they aren't "good enough" for the PUG. So maybe I would share a lousy architecture picture. SOMEONE has to make everyone else look good. Actually, I think the biggest problem with the PUG, has been for sometime and will continue to be, getting feedback/comments. With a PESO, one pic at a time, usually the photographer gets at least one comment, if even only by someone being "nice." Marnie aka Doe ;-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
