You may have read an earlier post in which I explained that the shadow was done sort of in an effort to 'save' the image. Didn't (still don't) feel the image is strong enough on its other merits. Both the sad state of the right tree and the base old/dirty snow are distractions. In burning in the donut shadow, I covered no other elements.
Jack --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Jack, > > The tree looks very interesting. The shadow thing doesn't even look > real to me - very odd looking. I think it has a major negative > impact > on what otherwise might be a great photograph. > > -- > Bruce > > > Saturday, July 8, 2006, 7:33:45 AM, you wrote: > > JD> Would appreciate y'all taking a look and sending along your > JD> reaction/repulsion. > JD> Taken 10 years ago on a foggy AM at Crater Lake, OR. > JD> I've always felt a little guilty about the donut shadow. Should > I? > JD> Mamiya 6, 75mm lens on T-Max 100. > > JD> Seeking comments. > > JD> Jack > > JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=121 > > > JD> __________________________________________________ > JD> Do You Yahoo!? > JD> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > JD> http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
