I doubt half of the system is eliminated with an all in lens system. If
fact I'll bet that you'll find mechanical analogs of all of the parts
that used to be in the camera body in each lens.
Mark Roberts wrote:
>P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>
>
>>Accuracy is no more guaranteed with a mechanical system entirely in the
>>lens than with some of it in the camera body and part in the lens.
>>
>>
>
>True, but accuracy is more expensive to achieve with a mechanical
>system. You will of course always have a mechanical system in the lens
>as long as the diaphragm itself is a mechanical device, but with the
>mechanical set-up as it now exists, you have two mechanical systems,
>one in the camera, one in the lens, *both* of which must made
>accurate. With an electronic system like Canon or Minolta, half this
>mechanical stuff is eliminated.
>
>
>
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
