And, of course, for the maths department you need to hire the resident
loon on sci.math who claims to have a simple proof of Fermat's last
theorem (insert obligatory joke here about the margins of this post
being too small to contain the proof).

There's a reason why the patent department returns claims about
perpetual motion machines, unopened, and it's not to suppress
freedom of speech - it's to avoid wasting everybody's time.


On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 10:41:28AM -0400, graywolf wrote:
> Then you would not object to paying me to teach a course about Perpetual 
> Motion Engineering at the University of Toronto? Or how about a couse 
> about how Jackie had Marilyn murdered because John was going to devorce 
> her and marry Marilyn (which is no where near as far fetched as the 9/11 
> conspiracy stuff)?
> 
> -- 
> graywolf
> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
> http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
> -----------------------------------
> 
> 
> frank theriault wrote:
> > On 7/25/06, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I will defend the guys right to get up on a soap box, or write on the
> >> Internet, but I do not think he should be given official sanction or tax
> >> payer dollars to do so. Are we required to support every crackpot who
> >> wishes to tell us about his hallucinations?
> > 
> > It rankles me that people use the "not with my tax dollars" argument
> > to try to muzzle academics whose views don't coincide with theirs.
> > 
> > I didn't realize that part of the deal with public funds going to
> > universities was to allow the public to set curriculum, or otherwise
> > tell profs what to say (or not to say).
> > 
> > In fact, I thought that tax dollars going to post-secondary
> > institutions was all about recognizing that the particular values and
> > freedoms of academia were worth preserving and promoting, not so that
> > the government or the people could use that funding as a platform to
> > promote personal or popular agendas or censor unpopular thoughts.
> > 
> > I guess I'm naive.
> > 
> > cheers,
> > frank
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to