Interesting, since the US patent laws specifically says PM machines are not patentable, and any such are automatically rejected without consideration. Now it is possible some things have been patented that fall into that category, but the fact that they do has, in that case, been cleverly concealed by the applicant.
-- graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" ----------------------------------- DagT wrote: but in the US they do in fact have some granted > patents on inventions being classified as perpetual motion machines... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
