Exactly! Depicting "nature" is what drives many. Well prior to PS, I gave it up as a lab horror.
Jack --- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > It's the "choice" of a large segment of the viewing public. I've > always > > noticed that Pop Photo's Pentax 645 shooting Fitzharris (sp) or the > > editor's, 'real' them down considerably. Resolution is, IMO, the > only > > reason to shoot Velvia. > > Used when appropriate, Velvia is a wonderful film. Just like > anything, > it's not appropriate for every single photograph out there. Some > actual care and thought has to be put into your film - lighting - > exposure combination. > > Velvia on its own is nothing more than a film, not some horrorshow or > > offensive evil thing. I don't complain that NPZ is flat as hell when > I > shoot it in flat lighting conditions (though I've seen that complaint > > about a trillion times on the internet) -- I know that those > conditions > were inappropriate for that film. > > -Aaron > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
