Aaron, Yes that's exactly like what I'm saying. And I contend it to be true. Any mechanical/chemical/digital construct that captures an image which is subsequently displayed is a rendering of a scene. Just as people see and remember scenes differently, film and printing, and digital will result in rendered scenes.
It's up to the one who renders the scene or views the scene to decide if the result is pleasing or not. Tom C. "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered." >From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Some images... >Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:16:32 -0400 > > >On Aug 4, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > My contention has always been that Velvia is frequently appealing > > because it > > *brings the image up* in the viewers mind to the level where one > > doesn't > > think "the picture doesn't do it justice". > >This is like saying that NPZ "brings the image down". > >They are tools -- if you misuse them, you can't blame the results on >the nature of the tools. > >-Aaron > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
