On 18/08/06, K.Takeshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/17/06 8:24 PM, "Digital Image Studio", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's very "CHEAP" for what customers can get. Pentax obviously went > for the most bang for the money using existing component and some. When > people see good product at the very competitive price, they stash out the > money. I think it's that simple as far as the K100D is concerned. You > cannot argue with the success :-). > Just a few years ago, there were enough doubters that Pentax could even > offer any DSLR. Then they declared that digital era is the opportunity, and > started rather "un-Pentax like" effort to be bolder in offering new and > excellent products. Now they are closing in and even competing with N/C in > certain market segment, and it appears that more fun would be coming. Good > for them, and good for us :-). > For those who really go for the price alone, there is K110D. I wonder what their percentage profit per unit is compared with Canon and Nikon? -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
